Listen now | I found Professor Kandel's proposal fascinating, but also deeply unsettling. I sought to explain why, while he sought to assuage my fears. Part III of our three-part conversation.
I really like this kind of discourse. But as an involved Israeli for 64years— how could this ‘dream’ be brought about ? In our present situation the only ‘power’ is the Knesset as we observe day to darkening day.
I too was impressed with the thoughtful ideas and well explained proposal. I think focusing on how to make Israel a melting pot with each segment of the population fiscally responsible well connected and some what independent would allow Israel to remain a Jewish democracy which includes citizens with different needs/values.
I agree with those below. How to realistically sell this? Please provide updates if it gets traction.
I did enjoy the three session discourse. As presented, it gave the listener time to thoughtfully consider each aspect. One thing to consider is Israel a new country 1947 or an old country 1000 bc. If a new country then of course change and growth are more natural but if old, such a novel concept maybe a little late in the game there is too much history to overcome. Also you have to be able to sell this idea probably to groups that no interest in change and are completely entrenched in there own world view.
There is hope consider the Word of God through the prophet Isaiah 9:6,7
I really like this kind of discourse. But as an involved Israeli for 64years— how could this ‘dream’ be brought about ? In our present situation the only ‘power’ is the Knesset as we observe day to darkening day.
I too was impressed with the thoughtful ideas and well explained proposal. I think focusing on how to make Israel a melting pot with each segment of the population fiscally responsible well connected and some what independent would allow Israel to remain a Jewish democracy which includes citizens with different needs/values.
I agree with those below. How to realistically sell this? Please provide updates if it gets traction.
I did enjoy the three session discourse. As presented, it gave the listener time to thoughtfully consider each aspect. One thing to consider is Israel a new country 1947 or an old country 1000 bc. If a new country then of course change and growth are more natural but if old, such a novel concept maybe a little late in the game there is too much history to overcome. Also you have to be able to sell this idea probably to groups that no interest in change and are completely entrenched in there own world view.
There is hope consider the Word of God through the prophet Isaiah 9:6,7